it's a Kirby

Entries tagged as ‘knowledge’

Necessary

August 25, 2009 · Leave a Comment

uni


It is the responsibility of libraries to guarantee and facilitate access to all expressions of knowledge and intellectual activity, including those which [sic] some elements of society may consider to be unconventional, unpopular, or unacceptable. To this end, libraries shall acquire and make available the widest variety of materials.


Librarians believe in intellectual freedom because it is as natural to us, and as necessary to us, as the air that we breathe. Censorship is anathema to us because it inhibits our role in life—to make the recorded knowledge and information of humankind freely available to everyone, regardless of faith or the lack of it, ethnicity, gender, age, or any other of the categories that divide us one from the other. I strongly believe we should hold fast to intellectual freedom and carry out our tasks without reference to our own opinions or the opinions of those who want to restrict free access to knowledge.



MICHAEL GORMAN, Our Enduring Values: Librarianship in the 21st Century Chicago : ALA, 2000.

Two of Suzanne’s favourite sayings covertly expressing her motherly views were, “Are you sure?” or “I don’t think that’s really necessary.”

All I can say is that I’m forever grateful that as a boy of fifteen (circa 1974) at Rogers High School in Toledo, Ohio, our library carried a subscription to The Village Voice where I finely combed the personals for any reference to “GWM” and counted on the small print ad appearing in every issue for The Adonis ALL-MALE Cinema where the tiny line drawing of a naked male torso fueled my fantasies and launched me towards my first grand adventure as a gay teen in search of…

Categories: Current · Read.
Tagged: , , , , , ,

Reader v. learner

August 13, 2009 · 1 Comment

Vasconcelos


A learned man is a sedentary, concentrated solitary enthusiast, who searches through books to discover some particular grain of truth upon which he has set his heart. If the passion for reading conquers him, his gains dwindle and vanish between his fingers. A reader, on the other hand, must check the desire for learning at the onset; if knowledge sticks to him well and good, but to go in pursuit of it, to read on a system, to become a specialist or an authority, is very apt to kill what it suits us to consider the more human passion for pure and disinterested reading.

VIRGINIA WOOLF, “Hours in a Library,” in The Essays of Virginia Woolf, v.2, 1912-1918. ed. Andrew McNeille ; London : Hogarth Press, 1987.

Photo: Biblioteca Vasconcelos

more >

Categories: Read.
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Defined by service

August 10, 2009 · 1 Comment

murals


effort inspired by philanthropic motives or dedicated to human welfare or betterment. “service”Webster’s Third

“…a profession based on service is an altruistic profession. Our desire is to serve individuals and, in doing so, to serve society and humanity as a whole.”

Without being pious, one can state that the concept of the duty and service inspired by professional values and a desire to better humankind can be a guiding light for all librarians and library policies. Conversely, it is hard to imagine a productive and effective library that is not imbued with the idea of service or to envisage a happy work life for an individual in such a library.

Librarianship is a profession defined by service. Every aspect of librarianship, every action that we take as librarians can and should be measured in terms of service… Our service can be as large as a successful integration of library instruction with the undergraduate curriculum or as small as a single brief act of helpfulness to a catalogue user. Whichever it is, the value of service can and should pervade our professional lives so that it becomes the yardstick by which we measure all our plans and projects and the means by which we assess success or failure of all our programs.

MICHAEL GORMAN, Our Enduring Values: Librarianship in the 21st Century Chicago : ALA, 2000.

This “call” to service, which informs/guides every decision I make, is why I’ve chosen a second career in the library field. It is in no way pious, nor trite. It is simply these values that continue to shape me and a more approachable world.

I am currently seeking employ as a Library Technician. At your service: kirby@jeffkirby.com

Note: Why this book wasn’t required, (let alone recommended), reading at Seneca speaks volumes as to what their LIT program so sorely lacks: inspiration.

Photo: Murals inside the Main Branch of the Toledo-Lucas County Public Library. It was here, just a little over a year ago, I stood with Suzanne and decided to embark on my new career.

Categories: Current · Read.
Tagged: , , , , ,

To know.

May 18, 2009 · Leave a Comment

 

zin, originally uploaded by dlxlb.

It is one thing . . . to remember, another to know. To remember is to safeguard something entrusted to your memory, whereas to know, by contrast, is actually to make each item your own, and not to be dependent on some original and be constantly looking to see what the master said.

SENECA*, Letters to Lucilius, 1st century BC, trans. Robin Campbell

*O, the irony.

Categories: Read. · man · omfg · play
Tagged: , , , , , , ,

data>information>knowledge>wisdom*

October 29, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Part One: Life
CXXVI

The brain is wider than the sky,
For, put them side by side,
The one the other will include
With ease, and you beside.

The brain is deeper than the sea,
For, hold them blue to blue,
The one the other will absorb,
As sponges, buckets do.

The brain is just the weight of God,
For, lift them pound for pound
And they will differ, if they do,
As syllable from sound.

EMILY DICKINSON (1830-1886)

I am a firm believer that without speculation there is no good and original observation. - Charles Darwin, Letter to A. R. Wallace, 1857

Civilization begins with a rose. – Gertrude Stein, As Fine as Melanctha

*Information is the juxtaposition of data to create meaning. – Alex Wright, Glut

Artist: Mark Rothko
ROTHKO: The Late Series, curated by Achim Borchardt-Hume, Tate Modern, now through 1 February 2009

Categories: Current · Read.
Tagged: , , , ,

What is a book?

October 27, 2008 · 2 Comments




Knowledge doesn’t have a shape. There are just too many useful, powerful, and beautiful ways to make sense of our world.

Books are for use.

Every person his or her books.

Every book its readers.

Save the time of the reader; save the time of the library staff.

The library is a growing organism.*

Shilayi Ramamrita RANGANATHAN, The Five Laws of Library Science

_____

Suppose that now, for the first time in history, we are able to arrange our concepts without the silent limitations of the physical. How might our ideas, organizations, and knowledge itself change?

. . . as we invent new principles of organization that make sense in a world of knowledge freed from physical constraints, information doesn’t just want to be free. It wants to be miscellaneous.

. . . now we—the customers, the employees, anyone—We can confront the miscellaneous directly in all its unfulfilled glory. We can do it ourselves and, more significantly, we can do it together, figuring out the arrangements that make sense for us now and the new arrangements that make sense a minute later. Not only can we find what we need faster, but traditional authorities cannot maintain themselves by insisting that we go through them. The miscellaneous order is not transforming only business. It is changing how we think the world itself is organized and—perhaps more important—who we think has the authority to tell us so.

DAVID WEINBERGER, Everything is Miscellaneous: The Power of the New Digital Disorder

* My ital.

Categories: Read.
Tagged: , , , , ,

The frantic search for happiness.

August 29, 2008 · Leave a Comment




We confuse emotions with knowledge, and we confuse knowledge with wisdom.

Knowledge is not wisdom. Knowledge is the domain of scientific and intellectual inquiry. Wisdom goes beyond self-awareness. It permits us to interpret the rational and the nonrational. It is both intellectual and intuitive. And those who remained trapped within the confines of knowledge and pedantry do not commune with the larger world. They cannot see or speak the deeper truths of life. This is why we turn, especially in our moments of deepest despair or greatest joy, to artistic and religious expression. The expression of the sacred, part of the human desire to preserve and honor that which cannot be tallied and quantified, is what makes the liturgy of religious life powerful and real, despite the corruption of the institutions behind them.

Paul Tillich catches these truths when he writes, “The courage to be is rooted in the God who appears when God has disappeared in the anxiety of doubt.”

All this is being lost. The modern world, with its vast, soulless urban enclaves, is divorcing itself from the rhythms of nature and community. Our days are filled with mindless tasks, the drudgery of work and a gnawing loneliness. The mental pollution of sound bites, the dizzying and ceaseless chatter of television and computers, the constant assault of advertising seek to fill the void with a virtual, image-based illusion. This world is escapist. We are bombarded, thousands of times a day, with the emotional simplicity and terrible beauty of lies. And we believe them. We believe them because they make us feel, at least for a moment, better and empowered. We increasingly lack the intellectual and self-critical tools to disentangle this net of lies from truth.

Many who live in the United States, plagued by its consumer culture, waste their energy attempting to satisfy the insatiable demands of an all-consuming self. People have become cut off, engulfed in the fruitless search to find an unachievable happiness in the things they accumulate, the experiences and products they are sold, or the careers they have built. The promised self-fulfillment, of course, never arrives. Consumers are prodded with even greater urgency to seek solace in newer products, greater opulence and increased status. The frantic search for happiness is endless, “since,” as Proust wrote, “what one has obtained is never anything but a new starting-point for further desires.”

Our national obsession with with wealth, celebrity and power has become a soul-crushing disease. The incessant chasing after status and wealth has plunged much of the country into unmanageable debt. Families live in oversized houses with palladium windows, financed with mortgages they cannot repay. They seek identity through their Nike shoes or Coach handbags. They occupy their leisure time in malls buying things they do not need. They spend their weekdays in little cubicles, if they have stable jobs, under the heel of corporations who have disempowered the American worker, taken control of the state, and can lay them off on a whim. It is a desperate scramble. No one wants to be left behind. The epistemology of television has left us ignorant, without the vocabulary to express this awful transformation.

Television, as [Neil] Postman wrote, “is transforming our culture into one vast arena for show business.” The danger we face is not an Orwellian 1984-style dictatorship, but Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, where we waste our lives in the vain and impossible pursuit of a self-centered, universal happiness.

“What Orwell feared were those who would ban books,” Postman wrote:

What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one [my ital]. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy. In short, Orwell feared what we hate will ruin us. Huxley feared that what we love will ruin us.

CHRIS HEDGES, I Don’t Believe in Atheists

Categories: Current · Read.
Tagged: , , , , ,

It is not natural for nature to be known.

July 25, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Knowledge doesn’t really form part of human nature. Conflict, combat, the outcome of the combat, and consequently, risk and chance are what gives rise to knowledge. Knowledge is not instinctive, it is counterinstinctive; just as it is not natural, but counternatural.

There is nothing in knowledge that enables it, by any right whatever, to know this world. It is not natural for nature to be known. Thus, between the instincts and knowledge, one finds not a continuity but, rather, a relation of struggle, domination, servitude, settlement. In the same way, there can be no relation of natural continuity between knowledge and the things that knowledge must know. . . Knowledge can only be a violation of the things to be known, and not a perception, a recognition, an identification of or with those things.

What assurance is there that knowledge has the ability to truly know the things of the world instead of being indefinite error, illusion, and arbitrariness?

MICHEL FOUCAULT, Power: Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984. Vol. 3. Ed. James D. Faubion. New York: The New Press. 2000.

Categories: Read.
Tagged: ,